dyncom: Clarify precedence for ternary statements
This commit is contained in:
parent
004b23153b
commit
8c6edc680c
3 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
|
@ -1400,7 +1400,7 @@ u32 vfp_double_cpdo(ARMul_State* state, u32 inst, u32 fpscr)
|
|||
u32 except;
|
||||
char type;
|
||||
|
||||
type = fop->flags & OP_SD ? 's' : 'd';
|
||||
type = (fop->flags & OP_SD) ? 's' : 'd';
|
||||
if (op == FOP_EXT)
|
||||
pr_debug("VFP: itr%d (%c%u) = op[%u] (d%u)\n",
|
||||
vecitr >> FPSCR_LENGTH_BIT,
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1290,7 +1290,7 @@ u32 vfp_single_cpdo(ARMul_State* state, u32 inst, u32 fpscr)
|
|||
u32 except;
|
||||
char type;
|
||||
|
||||
type = fop->flags & OP_DD ? 'd' : 's';
|
||||
type = (fop->flags & OP_DD) ? 'd' : 's';
|
||||
if (op == FOP_EXT)
|
||||
pr_debug("VFP: itr%d (%c%u) = op[%u] (s%u=%08x)\n",
|
||||
vecitr >> FPSCR_LENGTH_BIT, type, dest, sn,
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue