kernel/svc: Move address arbiter waiting behind a unified API function
Rather than let the service call itself work out which function is the proper one to call, we can make that a behavior of the arbiter itself, so we don't need to directly expose those implementation details.
This commit is contained in:
parent
3b63a46ca4
commit
0209de123b
3 changed files with 24 additions and 19 deletions
|
@ -1479,21 +1479,9 @@ static ResultCode WaitForAddress(VAddr address, u32 type, s32 value, s64 timeout
|
|||
return ERR_INVALID_ADDRESS;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const auto arbitration_type = static_cast<AddressArbiter::ArbitrationType>(type);
|
||||
auto& address_arbiter = Core::System::GetInstance().Kernel().AddressArbiter();
|
||||
switch (static_cast<AddressArbiter::ArbitrationType>(type)) {
|
||||
case AddressArbiter::ArbitrationType::WaitIfLessThan:
|
||||
return address_arbiter.WaitForAddressIfLessThan(address, value, timeout, false);
|
||||
case AddressArbiter::ArbitrationType::DecrementAndWaitIfLessThan:
|
||||
return address_arbiter.WaitForAddressIfLessThan(address, value, timeout, true);
|
||||
case AddressArbiter::ArbitrationType::WaitIfEqual:
|
||||
return address_arbiter.WaitForAddressIfEqual(address, value, timeout);
|
||||
default:
|
||||
LOG_ERROR(Kernel_SVC,
|
||||
"Invalid arbitration type, expected WaitIfLessThan, DecrementAndWaitIfLessThan "
|
||||
"or WaitIfEqual but got {}",
|
||||
type);
|
||||
return ERR_INVALID_ENUM_VALUE;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return address_arbiter.WaitForAddress(address, arbitration_type, value, timeout);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Signals to an address (via Address Arbiter)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue