Profiler: Implement QPCClock to get better precision on Win32
MSVC 2013 (at least) doesn't use QueryPerformanceCounter to implement std::chrono::high_resolution_clock, so it has bad precision. Manually implementing our own clock type using it works around this for now.
This commit is contained in:
parent
cd1fbfcf1b
commit
dc8a3f8bc8
2 changed files with 42 additions and 1 deletions
|
@ -6,6 +6,12 @@
|
|||
#include "common/profiler_reporting.h"
|
||||
#include "common/assert.h"
|
||||
|
||||
#if defined(_MSC_VER) && _MSC_VER <= 1800 // MSVC 2013.
|
||||
#define NOMINMAX
|
||||
#define WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN
|
||||
#include <Windows.h> // For QueryPerformanceCounter/Frequency
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
namespace Common {
|
||||
namespace Profiling {
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -13,6 +19,23 @@ namespace Profiling {
|
|||
thread_local Timer* Timer::current_timer = nullptr;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#if defined(_MSC_VER) && _MSC_VER <= 1800 // MSVC 2013
|
||||
QPCClock::time_point QPCClock::now() {
|
||||
static LARGE_INTEGER freq;
|
||||
// Use this dummy local static to ensure this gets initialized once.
|
||||
static BOOL dummy = QueryPerformanceFrequency(&freq);
|
||||
|
||||
LARGE_INTEGER ticks;
|
||||
QueryPerformanceCounter(&ticks);
|
||||
|
||||
// This is prone to overflow when multiplying, which is why I'm using micro instead of nano. The
|
||||
// correct way to approach this would be to just return ticks as a time_point and then subtract
|
||||
// and do this conversion when creating a duration from two time_points, however, as far as I
|
||||
// could tell the C++ requirements for these types are incompatible with this approach.
|
||||
return time_point(duration(ticks.QuadPart * std::micro::den / freq.QuadPart));
|
||||
}
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
TimingCategory::TimingCategory(const char* name, TimingCategory* parent)
|
||||
: accumulated_duration(0) {
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue